when you have a public construction project, it should have an End User within the public sector who will be in charge of the project’s administration after hand over ( say for example, constructing buildings for the civil defense, public libraries, public hospitals .. etc ) and this end user allocates the budget for the project, hence the question, who is the end user in the case of ” عيش كريم “, i.e who is paying for consultancy fees, project management & the current contractors? I didn’t get the part where it said there are housing investors who get shares !! the government is giving the land plots, is it putting tax money too? or are there investors?

handling of supervision of the construction process & the management of such a project, should be in my opinion, GAM not (مؤسسة التطوير و الاسكان الحضري), hence all the problems will keep popping up, the project should have been tendered formally through the Procurement and Contracting Directorate in GAM & GAM should review the project drawings, tender documents, cost, payments, issue necessary NOCs, building permits, and do the testing and commissioning of all services before hand over. if there is no one to inspect, how would you know that there is no cheating on site or that the contractors are really fixing materials according to spex? if the end user, consultant and the contractor is the government.. shu dal? what a joke.

now in the current case, who is supervising & who will be handed the project after completion? and who will make sure there will be fair distribution on people who really need, who will handle the payments process from tenants ?